Wikipedia reliable source
ME: Not only Facebook can be a primary and reliable source, it's also the virtual place where the fact I want to add on wikipedia page happened. WM2: You're dumb, WM1 just told you Facebook can't be a primary source. Go away. ME: I can be dumb but I still think Facebook may be a primary and reliable source.The fact that Wikipedia is not a reliable source for academic research doesn't mean that it's wrong to use basic reference materials when you're trying to familiarize yourself with a topic. In fact, the Harvard librarians can point you to specialized encyclopedias in different fields that offer introductory information.Wikipedia articles should be based on reliable, published secondary sources, and to a lesser extent, on tertiary sources and primary sources. Secondary or tertiary sources are needed to establish the topic's notability and avoid novel interpretations of primary sources.
Did you know?
The letter itself does not establish whether it is a reliable source about the validity of the book's claims, or a reliable source about the perfectly understandable discomfort of scientists who fear being associated with the book, or who are uncomfortable with inadvertently discovering things that go against their own liberal leanings (which they are …At ThoughtCo, we believe that great inspiration begins with a question, and we help 13 million users answer theirs every month. Whether yours is about science and math, humanities and religion, or architecture and the arts, our in-depth articles, written by literature writers, Ph.D.s, and experienced instructors, are designed to give you the …Snooker statistics must be sourced to a reliable source(s), and Snooker.info does not meet this criteria due to being self-published. We realize the problem, but replacing out of date information with unreliable information doesn't solve the problem. ... Cuetracker seems to be a pretty good webiste but I'm not sure it qualifies under the Wikipedia' "reliable source" …About Wikipedia; Contact us; Donate; Contribute Help; Learn to edit; Community portal; Recent changes; Upload file; Search. Create account; Log in; Personal tools. Create account; Log in; Pages for logged out editors learn more. Contributions; Talk; Contents move to sidebar hide (Top) 1 Requested move. 5 comments Toggle Requested move …Notability of reliable sources is the application of Wikipedia's rules on WP:Notability to the WP:Reliable sources which Wikipedia editors cite. This document considers assigning notability to sources on the basis of their importance as citations in Wikipedia. This creates a situation where Wikipedia is publishing and circulating the name of a ...Wikipedia's information is reliable not because it uses a single "authoritative" source as a reference, but rather because it is a collection of references that represents the accepted knowledge of the academic world.Video games[ edit] In articles about video games, citing the game itself is often attractive. Wikipedia favours secondary sources, and the use of primary sources should be minimised. Games are primary sources in articles about themselves. Whether it is good to use them as a source varies by perspective, subject and game.For popular articles, Wikipedia's online community of volunteers, administrators and bots ensure edits are based on reliable citations. Popular articles are reviewed thousands of times.Biomedical information must be based on reliable, third-party published secondary sources, and must accurately reflect current knowledge.This guideline supports the general sourcing policy with specific attention to what is appropriate for medical content in any Wikipedia article, including those on alternative medicine.Language links are at the top of the page across from the title.Wikipedia is an open-source, openly edited online encyclopedia created in 2001. Wikipedia is a free online encyclopedia featuring openly editable content created and sourced by users from around ...Wikipedia reports information from other sources, making it a secondary source. Many professors prefer that students cite primary sources. When citing Wikipedia ...The linked video is a reliable source and I ask to create an entry in the article, that "people are beaten in Ukraine for wearing Saint Georgian Cross as symbol of victory in Great Patriotic War". The evidence is provided. 87.78.236.178 15:35, 10 …Also, they prefer secondary sources to primary sources. Guidelines permit primary sources but official Wikipedia policy instructs, “Do not analyze, evaluate, interpret, or synthesize material found in a primary source yourself; instead, refer to reliable secondary sources that do so.” In other words, experts must not act like experts.There are three citations from reliable sources, including two from Disney, that state it will be aired on October 18, 2009. TV Guide, another reliable source, supports this. That is why October 18 is used in the article. YouTube is not a reliable source so it can't be used to support an earlier airdate, especially since the airdate isn't ...This is an explanatory essay about the the Wikipedia:Reliable sources guideline. Wikipedia's policies or guidelines thoroughly vetted by the community. Reliable sources must be able to be verified. This does not mean that any particular person at any given moment must be capable of verifying them.See also: Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources, Wikipedia:No original research, and Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (medicine) Wikipedia's science articles are not intended to provide formal instruction, but they are nonetheless an important and widely used resource. Scientific information should be based on reliable published sources ...If you’re a farmer or someone who relies on tractors for your daily tasks, you know how important it is to have a reliable source for tractor supplies. In the past, finding the right parts or equipment could be a time-consuming and frustrat...An untapped source of reliable labor. People with disabilities represent one of the country’s largest and most reliable — if underutilized — labor sources. In the United …Wikipedia is an open-source, openly edited online encyclopedia created in 2001. Wikipedia is a free online encyclopedia featuring openly editable content created and sourced by users from around ...Yes. But only as a reference. Wikipedia is frowned upon. Not really. What you should do is look at their sources and quote those after reading them. i must be missing something bc encyclopedia britannica is a different thing from wikipedia. once upon a time ppl bought TOMES of fact-books for their homes/kids, and encyclopedia britannica is one ...While Wikipedia is a valuable resource, it is not infallible, and this is where the significance of referring to original sources cited in the footnotes comes into play. …Primary sources may only be used on Wikipedia to make straightforward, descriptive statements of facts that can be verified by any educated person with access to the source but without further, specialized knowledge. But it's a good idea to quote the Quran and Hadith to explain a topic, if they are cited in reliable secondary sources.
According to the latest official figures, there are Wikipedia sites in 300 different languages, with some 46 million articles accessed by 1.4 billion unique devices every single month, while an ...Wikipedia's guideline on Reliable sources states that "Articles should be based on reliable, independent, published sources with a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy." Wikipedia's guideline on Notability states that "If a topic has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject, it is presumed to ... Primary sources may only be used on Wikipedia to make straightforward, descriptive statements of facts that can be verified by any educated person with access to the source but without further, specialized knowledge. But it's a good idea to quote the Quran and Hadith to explain a topic, if they are cited in reliable secondary sources.The difficulty, of course, lies in that word “reliable.” Generative AI has an unfortunate tendency to hallucinate , at times making up both information and seemingly …
Are wikis reliable sources? Wikis, including Wikipedia and other wikis sponsored by the Wikimedia Foundation, are not regarded as reliable sources. However, wikis are excellent places to locate primary and secondary sources.Citing the Internet Movie Database ( IMDb) on Wikipedia raises questions if such references do not follow the important points given in the reliable sources guideline. This is because much of the database content in IMDb is contributed by users, not by experts. Plus, the editorial oversight by IMDb staff is minimal and not stated on the site ...WikiProject Korea/Reliable sources. 33,383 out of 6,720,579 articles. The list below provides the names of Korean sites that can and cannot be used as a source. If you want to request a source as reliable, submit your question for consensus. The same method if you want to question the reliability of a source.…
Reader Q&A - also see RECOMMENDED ARTICLES & FAQs. Here is the source (without the video): Williams, Nathan (2002-11-26) . Possible cause: Per Wikipedia:Reliable source examples#Religious sources, religious sour.
Feb 8, 2017 · The site’s rules on reliable sources state: “Wikipedia articles should be based on reliable, published, sources, making sure that all majority and significant minority views that have appeared ... Citing the Internet Movie Database ( IMDb) on Wikipedia raises questions if such references do not follow the important points given in the reliable sources guideline. This is because much of the database content in IMDb is contributed by users, not by experts. Plus, the editorial oversight by IMDb staff is minimal and not stated on the site ...Take, for example, the one so called "reliable source" that was cited as grounds for calling the project dormant, which is from September 2014. That's a year out of date and completely irrelevant, and absolutely should not be considered to trump a much more recent primary source. Sprhodes 15:37, 17 September 2015 (UTC) Reply
Notability of reliable sources is the application of Wikipedia's rules on WP:Notability to the WP:Reliable sources which Wikipedia editors cite. This document considers assigning notability to sources on the basis of their importance as citations in Wikipedia. This creates a situation where Wikipedia is publishing and circulating the name of a ... Jul 31, 2023 · Wikipedia is an excellent place to go for information, but many researchers don’t feel comfortable citing it as a resource due to its open contribution model - in other words, anyone can edit Wikipedia. They just don't feel that Wikipedia is a reliable source of information, whereas a source like Britannica is, generally, more reliable. Evaluating Digital Sources. Because so much information is now available online, it’s important to know how to navigate digital sources versus print sources. Today, almost every print source has a digital edition (e.g., ebooks, online newspapers), and some academic journals only publish digitally. However, despite the many credible digital ...
24 jul 2020 ... The Wikipedia community recently engaged in a s LLMs do not follow Wikipedia's policies on verifiability and reliable sourcing. LLMs sometimes exclude citations altogether or cite sources that don't meet Wikipedia's reliability standards (including citing Wikipedia as a source). In some case, they hallucinate citations of non-existent references by making up titles, authors, and URLs.As a reliable source: * Sometimes. Ancestry.com contains two types of material, which have separate considerations. Official documents such as birth and death records come from reliable sources and can be used provided the restrictions discussed in WP:PRIMARY and WP:BLPPRIMARY are obeyed. In all cases, a secondary source is preferred. 8 sept 2023 ... Most Wikipedia entries include footnotes, links toCiting the Internet Movie Database ( IMDb) on Wikipedi Wiki-Transpose rely only on Wikipedia as information source for translations. The main goal of this paper is to check the coverage ratio of Wikipedia against specializedqueries that are related to medical domain. Wiki-Transpose was evaluated using bothEnglish and Portuguese medical queries.Take, for example, the one so called "reliable source" that was cited as grounds for calling the project dormant, which is from September 2014. That's a year out of date and completely irrelevant, and absolutely should not be considered to trump a much more recent primary source. Sprhodes 15:37, 17 September 2015 (UTC) Reply Reliable Sources. Reliable Sources is an American Wikipedia is not a reliable source for academic writing or research. Wikipedia is increasingly used by people in the academic community, from first-year students to distinguished professors, as an easily accessible tertiary source for information about anything and everything and as a quick "ready reference", to get a sense of a concept or idea.The question is whether commercially available DVD's of firemen and other eyewitness constitutes a Wikipedia "Reliable Source." I don't see why it shouldn't. That would appear to have about the same status as a book. If we see an identifiable fireman on a commercially available DVD making a statement, it should be clear that he made the statement. Essay About Is Wikipedia A Reliable Sour24 jul 2020 ... The Wikipedia community recently The Gateway Pundit was founded prior to the 2004 United States pr The overall completeness of drug information in Wikipedia was 83.8±1.5% (p<0.001).”. They concluded that “Wikipedia is an accurate and comprehensive source of drug-related information for undergraduate medical education.”. It is nearly impossible to analyze when it comes to bias, as each entry changes frequently and is edited by people ... This page in a nutshell: Cite reliable sources.You can add a c Because Wikipedia is easily edited, it’s not considered reliable. But it is commonly used and can be useful as a starting place for research, especially for finding the sources that are cited in each article. In summary, here are some tips: When you find an article on Wikipedia, scroll to the end for the bibliographical information. For a source to be added to this list, edit[The difficulty, of course, lies in that word “reliabSourceForge is a web service that offers software consumers a ce Reuters using Wikipedia as a source does not make Wikipedia a reliable source generally. WP:V : "The burden of evidence lies with the editor who adds or restores material.", so if someone can cite that YA is a RS, or that the tabloid article for Chabad-Lubavitch article is a RS that would be a start.Main page; Contents; Current events; Random article; About Wikipedia; Contact us; Donate; Pages for logged out editors learn more